CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Why Morrisons confidence is not catching

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

Why Morrisons' confidence isn't catching

Confidence isn’t catching

Why aren’t investors buying Morrisons’ confidence that it can continue to grow?  The thumbs down–sending the stock progressively lower down the benchmark index on Wednesday—overrode stronger than forecast underlying 2017 profits, 5.8% revenue growth, and positive yearly and quarterly like-for-like sales trends. Most importantly, the market’s first take on the group’s 4 pence a share special dividend was also negative, seeming to disagree with the rationale offered by CEO David Potts that the bonus pay-out “reflects our good performance so far and confidence for the future.”

Shares drift lower, like margins

Investors might be acting on a more tempered view of the future for Britain’s No. 3 supermarket. Morrisons shares have wallowed so far this year, as have Tesco’s and Sainsbury’s, with barely a percentage point rise a piece, after losing 3%-10% in 2017. Big UK grocers are growing again: last week’s industry data showed all four—including Asda—increased market share over 12 weeks to the end of February, with help from the return of food price inflation. The problem is they are not growing as fast as upstarts Aldi and Lidl whose combined market share continues to advance, rising by almost a third over the period compared to low single-digit growth at the Big 4. Discount groceries are in demand as consumers respond to real wage declines by trading down, forcing the likes of Morrison to increase the proportion of ‘value’ brands in the mix. This has pressured margins: note for instance the seven basis-point slip in Morrisons’ operating margin during the year.

Cash flow is king

Shareholders are now schooled in supermarket tactics against Aldi and Lidl and they know cash flow is key. Selective use of free cash flow for ‘investment in price’ combined with revamped efficiency and slashed costs helped put the brakes on the decline of Tesco et al during their 2014-15 crisis. Morrisons’ “confidence” may therefore have rung a little hollow on Wednesday given that free cash flow generation almost halved to £350m from 2016/17’s £670m, despite 60% less net debt and a modest dividend rise (9%). The quality of that cash flow was also questionable. Only £132m was from retail sales whilst disposal proceeds and improved working capital accounted for most of the rest.

Wiggle room and the lack thereof

Furthermore, the group cautioned that whilst revised store cash flow assumptions allowed a small “impairment reversal” of £8m, a rise in overall financing costs of as little as 1% relative to the current 9% discount rate could “result in an additional impairment charge of £96m”. Little wonder Morrisons gives itself sufficient wiggle room around the future “uses of free cash flow”. Prudently, it will be “guided each year by the principles” of its capital allocation framework “in assessing the uses of free cash flow.” But in doing so, the group will also be acknowledging that expectations still price more ‘perfection’ than it can be certain to deliver. Morrison’s forward rating suggests it is still pricey. And at 17.19 times 2018 earnings, the stock is second only to Tesco and 5-10 points above M&S and Sainsbury’s. Wednesday’s 4% share price fall shows investors aren’t convinced it can grow much faster than these rivals.

Thoughts on Morrisons’ share price chart

Like many supermarket charts, Morrisons' is painful to watch. MRW slumped below long-term trend (200-day moving average; blue line) in November signalling a deep loss of support that has yet to return. Note that Wednesday’s slump follows an attempt by buyers to reclaim ground above the threshold but the stock suffered a large rejection immediately after almost tagging the line. The glaring slide is clearly the stock’s biggest for months and that underscores deteriorating sentiment. A rising line from November’s 2017 lows looks to have some validity as support, though buyers oughtn’t to be surprised if the stock pierces it and eyes higher-probability support between 205-202p at the 2017 low after a prior test in September 2016. Overhead, besting prior support that is now resistance at 230p would smooth the edges off the bear case. That needs to happen sooner rather than later for buyers. Delay will confront MRW with a possible break down at the apex of a wedge formed by the rising line we mentioned and a declining trend line that has capped highs since September. Current sentiment suggests the stock would break lower nearer the apex rather than higher. 

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024