CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Twitter shares head deeper into Twilight Zone

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

Another day, more fresh all-time lows for Twitter.

The stock has been on this grim streak since the first week of the year.

All told though, Thursday could have been a much worse session, after the micro-blog network arguably presented its worst set of earnings as a listed company the night before.

There was a severe let-down in the metric on which the market is most hawkish, and its sales forecast for the next quarter also disappointed.

 

  • 320 million Monthly Active Users (MAU), unchanged from Q3
  • Excluding “logged out users” (Tweeting by SMS texts) MAU actually fell for the first time to 305 million.
  • Q1 revenue guidance was $595m-$610m vs. $627m consensus
  • Q4 revenue rose 48.3% to $710.5m vs. $709.9m consensus
  • GAAP net loss shrank to $90.2m
  • Non-GAAP profit was $0.13/share, a cent above consensus, vs. Q4 2014’s $0.20/share

 

 

Chief window breaker 

To top it all, Twitter’s top execs again struck the same eerie, unflinchingly grim tone in the post-release call as they did last quarter.

Many have taken over operations formerly managed by VPs and senior officers who exited in a flood of “resignations” in January.

The macabre attitude of all who remained might have been inevitable.

Chief of among the Twitter dissers was, again, CEO Jack Dorsey.

He lambasted Twitter for its “broken windows and confusing parts”.

This was both refreshing and concerning, suggesting he now accepted Twitter needs serious repair from its ‘broken’ state.

Even, perhaps, that more windows may need to be smashed before a proper fix.

This of course “will take time”, to quote Executive Chairman Omid Kordestani.

That tone of realisation among top execs suggests an acceptance of further potential punishment for the shares.

 

 

Reality “checkpoints”

Meanwhile, Dorsey’s description of life as a double-CEO also had a surreal edge.

“We have a structure that allows me to see what’s happening in the week (at Twitter and Square),” Dorsey told analysts.

“We set off the week together at both companies and we have checkpoints and then the balance of my time is really spent on recruiting.”

There was no real explanation about safeguards, quality assurance, or back-ups in this.

Hopefully crisis management is as orderly as Dorsey suggested.

 

 

Talk is cheap, Twitter soon cheaper

In short, Twitter’s latest chance to re-cast the narrative among investors and critics, as we suggested was necessary last night, didn’t work.

That leaves little near-term prospect that the stock will emerge from the ‘Twilight Zone’ it has entered.

Takeover talk has persisted, but none of the mooted pre-M&A moves have been substantiated.

We reiterate our view that a takeover is unlikely—especially whilst TWTR trades above our Discounted Cash Flow Fair Value estimate.

We modelled fair value at $5.50/share in July last year, with much caution and qualification.

Using the same admittedly strict parameters right now marks fair value even lower, in theory as low as $3.61.

We assume the market value of a company in turmoil would logically need to be close to fair value for a CFO to recommend such a challenging takeover attempt.

 

 

From a technical basis, TWTR is descending in orderly fashion through the channel from last October.

New lows in quick succession make the task of setting further price points beneath, difficult.

Extension intervals from a rally which stalled close to $32 in late-October, place overhead challenges at $18 and $20, though when (or if) these will be faced is dicey.

 

DAILY CHART

Please click image to enlarge

 

 

Traders of City Index’s Twitter Daily Funded Trade have dealt the title back up to the week’s high a tad above 1550 several times, with no breakthrough.

Combined with the triangular tightening of the range in half-hourly intervals on Thursday, a moderate breakout could be imminent.

With aforementioned resistance so solid, a weaker direction of any new leg would not be a surprise.

 

 

HALF-HOURLY CHART: TWITTER DAILY FUNDED TRADE

Please click image to enlarge

 

 

 

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024