CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Sterling bloodied more than number ten

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

The government’s latest Parliamentary defeat should bring deeper pain in the near term for sterling than the government.

Abstainers swing for May

The market has certainly been unsettled by speculation that pro-Brexit Conservatives abstained. If doing so helped seal the fate of the government’s ‘Plan B’ motion, which was rejected by 303 votes to 258, it could point to the hard-line wing of the Tories resuming an obdurate stance from which it appeared to retreat in recent weeks. The more immediate worry is that Theresa May’s assertion to the EU that she can persuade MPs to vote for her plan, given changes, has been undermined. On the face of it, an incentive for Brussels to pull out all the stops to get a revised deal across the line has been removed

But even if members of the Brexit-supporting European Research Group, chaired by Jacob-Rees Mogg, did abstain, Thursday still looks to be more of an embarrassment for the Prime Minister than fatal for her strategy. Most importantly, tonight’s votes are non-binding. Again, as per, 29th January, such conditions should bolster Theresa May’s well-observed tendency to push ahead with plans regardless of opposition.

Meaningful Vote II

The tone of the amendments selected for voting was an early warning of a lack of ‘crunch’. As seen when MPs voted at the end of January, appetite to wrest control from the government remains ambivalent at best. All amendments were defeated. The logic of Theresa May’s promise of another ‘meaningful vote’ on 27th February is now clearer. The pledge appears to have removed pressure on Tory rebels and remain supporters across party lines to begin pulling the rug out from under the government immediately. Even before voting began, amendments dwindled down to three, with remain-supporting Anna Soubry pulling her amendment at the last minute.

Amendments selected by House of Commons speaker John Bercow on 14th February 2019 and results

Amendment

Result

  1. ‘A’ – (Labour) Called for vote on a revised deal, or debate on next steps by 27th Feb

Defeated 306/322

  1. ‘Amendment I’ – (SNP) For government to seek to delay Britain’s 29th March exit by at least 3 months

Defeated 93/315

  1. ‘Amendment E’ (Anna Soubry, Cons., Chuka Umunna, Lab.) – For government to publish analysis of impact of no-deal Brexit on business

N/A

Not for turning

None of tonight’s proceedings offer much encouragement to Theresa May, but there’s little doubt she will continue to pursue changes to the exit agreement as planned, particularly the Northern Ireland backstop. In turn, senior EU officials have kept up the mantra that the insurance policy is necessary and non-negotiable. The bloc continues to be open to make presentational changes to the deal to make more palatable to Parliament. This vicious circle shows all signs of continuing almost till the last minute before Brexit.

Welcome back vol.

Those 44 days remaining before Brexit, and diminishing, are rekindling implied volatility, on the back of deepening Brexit fog. The size of whipsaws projected in both short and long-term options trades are increasing for the first time in around a month. This suggests more investors are becoming jittery enough again to hedge and that speculators are being tempted back by potential fast price moves. Put another way, optimism that the pound could stabilise above $1.30 continues to ebb after it tumbled off a top of $1.32 late last month. The pound has also begun to react more negatively to weakening growth data, pointing to an evaporation of underlying confidence in the economy’s resilience.

Thoughts on sterling/U.S. dollar price chart

The rate and gradient at which cable has relinquished January’s gains—falling about 3.5% since 25th January—to trade below long and short-term averages was already creating tough hurdles for a rebound regardless of tonight’s outcome. At last look, with sterling still struggling around $1.28 handle, the nearest likely focus point on the downside could be a region of consolidation earlier in the month with a base at $1.27. But failure to quickly recapture corroborated support that is now resistance at $1.2865 would suggest sellers retain the whip hand. Kick back lows from December around $1.26 could then come back into play.

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024