CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

RSA Insurance shares surge but still short of possible bid price

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

The UK’s second-largest general insurance group might soon be Swiss.

At least shares of RSA Insurance Plc. have jumped their highest in one day since at least 2009 after Zurich Insurance Group Ltd, the UK’s largest counterpart in Switzerland, confirmed it was “evaluating a possible offer for RSA”.

 

Zurich bounced into disclosure by FT 

The Swiss group, which seems to have about 60,000 in its employ and operates in almost 200 locations around the globe, stated that it had noted “the recent market speculation in relation to RSA Insurance Group PLC and confirms that the company is evaluating a potential offer”.

There’s little doubt that this puts RSA ‘in play’, to use City argot meaning prone to potential corporate activity, but what is less certain is whether a deal will involve Zurich Group.

“This announcement does not amount to a firm intention to make an offer and there can be no assurance that any offer will be made”, the Swiss group pointed out.

This may be an acknowledgement beyond what is required for regulatory purposes, after Zurich was essentially bounced into going public with the discussions by a news report in the Financial Times.

According to the newspaper, Zurich was considering a bid for RSA worth £5.5bn/550p per share.

That compares with RSA’s £4.4bn market cap and an Ebitda (earnings before interest taxation, depreciation and amortisation) of £681m at the end of 2014.

The bid, if it were to come, would therefore be at quite impressive premium to Ebitda of 16.15x (and higher going forward considering RSA’s Ebitda is forecast to fall 22% this year).

However the premium to market capitalisation would imply c. 26% per share—compared to RSA stock’s close on Monday at £4.37.

That looks even more aggressive, given that Aviva only paid the equivalent of a 15% premium for Friends Life’s undisturbed market cap, before the takeover was formally sealed in April.

 

Shares hold back from bid price

Despite this, so far, RSA’s share price has risen strongly on Tuesday morning—trading as much as 15% higher at last count—but not quite far enough for the stock to match the value of the potential bid.

Classically, such shortfalls in a bid situation (or a possible one) tend to demonstrate the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ quite well: RSA’s share price betrays some uncertainty among its investors towards Zurich Insurance’s intentions.

The impending launch of new European rules governing how much money insurers must set aside to protect against potential market shocks, very probably played a large part in pushing Zurich to consider a deal of the kind on the table right now.

The aim would be to diversify revenue streams to make up for low investment returns and soft insurance prices in many markets.

However, investors in the UK group appear to be signalling that these imperatives should be worth more to a firm like Zurich, or even perhaps one of its rivals.

RSA’s strong market positions in Scandinavia, Canada, its large UK commercial franchise and operations in Latin America could certainly be of interest to significant players elsewhere in Europe and further overseas.

This view is partly balanced by RSA’s pension deficit, which has latterly been around £500m.

It increases the mooted premium Zurich has said it could pay by a respectable notch.

 

RSA still under investigation

As for RSA’s stock, perhaps even more caution than its holders have already ambivalently expressed this morning, might be in order.

Consider that this morning’s news has supercharged the orderly recovery from lows earlier this month at 404.70p.

These lows coincided with news that the UK’s Financial Reporting Council, a regulator, was investigating the conduct of certain individuals in connection with “financial irregularities” at the Irish division.

The investigation would cover 2012 “and relevant prior periods as a result of the identification of issues within the claims and accounting functions announced by RSA Insurance Group plc at the end of 2013,” the FRC said in a statement on 7th July.

RSA blamed a handful of executives at the Irish division for accounting irregularities that led to the group overstating its profits in Ireland and required it to tap shareholders for cash to plug the hole in its finances.

Either way, with the probe still on-going and RSA stock resting on ‘thin air’ whilst butting up against a falling trend from highs in February 2013, Tuesday’s 15% surge might well be at its limits.

Especially given indecisive momentum indicated by the Slow Stochastic sub-chart; where the faster ‘%D’ moving average (yellow) has crossed the longer term trend (in blue) on the downside.

Please click image to enlarge

 

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024