CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Poundland shares could still get cheaper

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

Are you a Lidl person or a Poundland person?

You’re likelier to favour Lidl, if your shopping habits have evolved with the new UK norm.

But Poundland really needs to become the budget choice of more High St. shoppers, and that showed on Thursday.

 

 

About ABs

Shares of the UK’s leading ‘single-price’ retailer set a new floor at 216p after half-year profit dipped 26% to £9.3m.

(IPO share price: 355p).

Cheap and cheerful as they are, the Lidls and Aldis of the discount world are not hamstrung by a business model that pretty much bakes-in the price of most items.

Poundland, founded in the West Midlands in 1990, is also still struggling to shake-off a down-at-heel image which high-profile German rivals dispensed with years ago, enabling them to attract more affluent clientele.

An exasperated Jim McCarthy, Poundland’s CEO, has evidently heard this criticism one time too many.

On Thursday he hit back against a related ‘misconception’; that as the economy continues to recover, customers will shop elsewhere.

In other words, the ‘£1-per-item’ model is unsustainable.

A quarter of Poundland’s UK customers are from the more affluent “AB” demographic, McCarthy countered.

And to be fair, at 25 years old, Poundland is a relative youngster, in single-price.

The US’s Dollar Tree has been trading on the same business model for more than 60 years.

Japan’s Daiso for over 40.

That’s all well and good.

Just don’t tell Poundland’s CEO the proportion of wealthier shoppers at Aldi and Lidl has risen about 200% in the space of 10 years.

Research by consultancy Him!, published in The Grocer magazine in March, found 31% of shoppers at the cut price upstarts were “AB”.

In 2005, only 1 in 10 of this group would deign to step into a Lidl.

The pace of discounters’ growth therefore continues to present long-term challenges for Poundland, though the shorter-term is no less dicey.

 

 

Lack of loom bands

PLND is still in the throes of integrating perhaps the biggest acquisition ever seen in the UK discount space, after buying 99p Stores for £55m in September.

The desperate chase of market share, scale and volume—a must for any sort of growth on its typically tight margins—continues to come at a cost.

Poundland opened 55 stores in the UK and Ireland in the six months to 27th September, against 34 in the same period a year ago.

A late Easter that didn’t fall in its last half year, and the kiddies’ ‘loom band’ (!) craze that boosted the comparable half, were also factors, it said.

 

 

‘Black Friday’ hopes

But the market seemed to most dislike Poundland’s explanation for like-for-like store sales slipping 2.8%.

This performance—worse than recent trading at most established retailers—was due to “volatile” conditions in the run up to Christmas.

There’s a developing notion that widening adoption of US-style ‘Black Friday’ promotions in late November has mutated more typical UK pre-Christmas shopping.

“It is a shape that we haven’t seen before,” McCarthy said, noting other retailers were experiencing similar.

But of course, the complaint didn’t stop him from falling back on this year’s Black Friday to project when Poundland trading would normalise.

Thursday’s punishment of the stock by as much as 23% shows shareholders’ patience is thinning further, with the fall for the year now close to 50%.

After all, PLND’s 21 times forward rating is still rich against closely matched retailers, including Sainsbury’s at 11.6 x.

The current UK No.2 pays a far better 4.3% yield than the discounter.

Closer still, B&M European Value Retail, which trades as B&M in its Northern England home turf, achieved an operating margin of 6.3% in its last full year against Poundland’s 0.3%.

Although lower key, B&M is currently expected to grow faster too, shares are rated at 26 times EPS forecast for 2016.

 

 

 

Despite the above, Poundland’s share fall into uncharted waters does make it less unattractive than before, by default.

Even if momentum (see sub-chart) suggests the downswing isn’t quite exhausted yet.

 

 DAILY CHART

Please click image to enlarge

 

Any takers will be those who those who take Poundland at its word, once again.

To quote from the company’s statement in November 2014, it is “dependent on delivering a good Christmas”.

 

 

 

 

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024