CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

No big Nasdaq nasties for now

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

No big Nasdaq nasties for now

Summary

From a technical perspective, the Nasdaq 100 shows little sign of ending its decade-long uptrend anytime soon.

Nasdaq’s decade

The U.S. stock market is on course for a near unbroken 10-year streak of annual gains. Whilst this rally of historic length has lifted all boats, seasoned participants are aware that it hasn’t lifted all boats equally. Over the past decade, both the broader Nasdaq Composite and its more compact and technology stock-centred cousin, the Nasdaq 100, have outperformed other key U.S. stock gauges. There’s no mystery for the disparity. Years of triple-digit percentage gains by shares in global online groups have powered Nasdaq indices higher.

A challenging year

Relatively narrow consistent participation in market leadership has its downsides of course. For one, when things are on the other foot for technology leaders, nerves rise in the broad market, and for good reason. For instance, amid global concerns about privacy, we’ve seen higher official scrutiny and tightening regulation over the practices of Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon and others. Along with the volatile sentiment accompanying many of their business models, new external challenges, some specific (regulatory headwinds) others global (trade/tariffs) have made share price progress of dominant technology companies more halting this year. This is reflected in Nasdaq indices.

Tariffs pressure Big Tech

Returns by the most-watched Nasdaq market, Nasdaq 100, are unsurpassed this year. It tacked on 17.64% by 29th August. A key investor worry then, is that Washington’s dispute with China combined with increasing regulation could create bigger obstacles for the web, streaming, e-commerce and software giants that are dependent on global consumption and dominate Nasdaq 100. Such worries came to a head (again) on Monday amid signs that the White House could impose the latest round of tariffs on China at almost any moment.

Measured anxiety

As ever, the long-term technical perspective on the index is only instructive to a point. However, it does suggest that so far, investor anxieties should be seen as contained. This is largely due to a widely accepted standard that technical analysts use for gauging the depth of retracements, or reversals. It is based on Fibonacci intervals, a topic that can be confusing for new chart watchers. Fortunately, all that needs to be understood is that key retracements are normative (meaning within the standard) if they’re no deeper than the 78.6% Fibonacci interval. In practice, most should be around 38.2% or, in a deeper downswing, near 61.8%. We apply these ideas to the market at hand in the chart below. We see that since July 2016, the Nasdaq has traded along a high-quality rising trend line. In itself, that’s a reassuring pattern for buyers.

Watch 7408

In context of that trend line, each retracement of the clearest prior up leg has indeed mostly been no sharper than 61.8%. In one case, in April, a retracement extended somewhat past the 78.6% Fibonacci, but the market swiftly ‘recovered’, in the sense that it quickly returned above the trend line and continued to rise. The Nasdaq’s current challenge comes as the market is on edge awaiting the latest U.S. tariffs on China. Weakened sentiment has seen the index falling toward a 38.2% Fibonacci (equating to about 7408 on the index). There’s no way of telling what prices will do from here using Fibonacci level alone. Furthermore, it’s worth remembering that relying exclusively on one chart technique alone for trading decisions is unwise. However, we can say that so far, rising trend line support offers decent prospects of a continued general upward trajectory for the Nasdaq 100. Relatively shallow Fibonacci intervals between the start of 2016 to date back that good probability. This will remain the case till retracements get much deeper and/or the rising trend line is definitively broken. This week could bring tensions that stoke further volatility for all stock markets, including the Nasdaq (again how much and when are difficult to predict from charts). But underlying Nasdaq 100 sentiment is likely to remain robust whilst its long-term trend and retracement patterns continue.

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024