CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

EasyJet share price dive may not be over

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

EasyJet hopes refreshed guidance will draw a line under parlous trading and a deep share price dive this year, but its stock remains on shaky ground.

 

EasyJet shares skidded to 3½-year lows on Thursday after finally fessing up that profits were going crash faster than even the most pessimistic expectations.

EasyJet scrapped guidance in the summer, saying trading conditions in the European airline industry had become so uncertain it could “not be precise about guidance”.

Forecasts were subsequently slashed from around £590m analysts were expecting on average as recently as July to £500m-£520m.

 

Even that range has now proven too optimistic.

The group said on Thursday profits for the year to 30th September would be between £490m-£495m.

EasyJet’s stats update wasn’t entirely reassuring either.

Whilst load factor clawed back ground lost in the summer, comments on revenue per seat showed the group remains on the wrong side of Europe’s fiercely competitive airfare environment.

 

For easyJet in particular, that points to Ryanair successfully edging the UK group’s market share back down, after the UK group’s incremental wins in recent years.

Note Ryanair’s load factor rose above its rival’s to 95% in September.

Wizz Air’s near-20% rise in passengers in the year-to-September also looks like encroachment.

 

Whilst we were recently proved wrong that easyJet’s shares had found a floor, it makes sense to expect the stock to stabilise now guidance uncertainty has passed.

Additionally, there’s little doubt that the skill of easyJet’s management team has saved the group from a much worse profit outcome during difficult operating conditions.

For that reason, we find easyJet sticking to a 50% pay-out ratio as credible for now and expect the dividend outlook to also cushion the shares.

 

However, it is not inconceivable that a 50% pay-out ratio could start to be viewed more critically by investors if profits and core metrics show no signs of improvement into year end.

From a technical perspective, easyJet stock has on Thursday breached a zone of support which held throughout market volatility following the Brexit vote, and, when easyJet scrapped forecasts.

The significance of the stock’s landing spot so far on Thursday is not exactly a proven floor: resistance turned support in March 2013 and near a strong support after a sharp dive that April.

On balance, traders are likely eye lower levels, particularly with a 1.272 (913p) Fibonacci extension of EZJ’s latest down leg nearby.

With no other glaringly obvious support below that marker, any sign of continued deterioration of easyJet trading into the year-end could extend the stock’s already worst-in-class fall this year even further.

 

DAILY CHART

 

Please click image to enlarge

 

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024