CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

China’s ‘National Team’ may be mobilising to stabilise its crumbling equity markets

Article By: ,  Market Analyst
  • Mainland Chinese equity indices are at or nearing pre-pandemic lows
  • An abrupt bout of ETF buying late Thursday has raised suspicion of state-backed involvement to stabilise market weakness
  • Sperate reports suggest the nation’s largest broker has banned short-selling by some clients
  • China’s A50 index surged late Thursday and has gone on with the move on Friday

China’s ‘National Team’ – a collection of state or quasi state-backed entities tasked by the Chinese government to smooth out financial market ructions when the prevailing price action is deemed desirable – looks like it may have been mobilised with China’s A50 ripping higher late Thursday and going on with the move today. Combined with depressed valuations, extreme pessimism and markedly improved setups on the charts, grounds for a near-term bounce appear to be growing.

National Team mobilised again?

With mainland Chinese equity indices either at or nearing post-pandemic lows after suffering a nasty plunge earlier this week on news the nation’s population decline accelerated last year, adding to an already sluggish economy, another downbeat session suddenly sprung to life late Thursday with the A50 and other indices surging late in the session.

As someone who witnessed the bubbles and busts in Chinese equities in the 2000s and 2010s, and the government’s ill-fated attempts to prevent widespread selling on the way down, it immediately drew comparisons to episodes of National Team involvement in past. I speculated about its involvement on X, formerly known as Twitter, when the abrupt bid started. It seems my hunch may have been on the money.

According to reports from Bloomberg late Thursday, the value traded in several ETFs tracking China’s benchmark CSI 300 index surged to levels not seen in years during the session, fitting with a similar modus operandi to known buying from state-backed entities in the past.

Central Huijin Investment, a sovereign wealth fund, bought an undisclosed amount of ETFs in October 2023, which you can circled on the A50 daily chart below, and vowed to keep increasing its holdings at the time. As such, the sudden spike in ETF volumes on Thursday suggests unofficial intervention may have taken place.

Signs of broadening state involvement

Adding to sense it may be part of a broader swathe of measures to stabilise mainland markets, there a sperate reports today suggesting CITIC Securities, China’s largest broker, has suspended short selling for some clients in mainland markets, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke with Bloomberg.

While National Team involvement rarely succeeds in reversing prevailing trends over the longer-term, its involvement can lead to short-term market squeezes that are often violent in their speed. While there’s no guarantee the same will occur on this occasion, it’s safe to say pessimism towards Chinese is quite low right now.

China A50 may be nearing a near-term bottom

Looking at China’s A50, it’s been nothing by lower highs and lower lows for much of the past six months. But the bullish candle printed on Thursday on the back of suspected National Team involvement, seeing the index bounce off both horizontal and downtrend support, suggests we may have put in a near-term bottom. Similar price action was seen back in October, again stemming from state involvement, which led to a modest bounce.

Adding to the case for more pronounced move, there has been bullish divergence between RSI and price since mid-December, with the former logging higher lows while the latter has printed lower lows. Near-term, the A50 really needs to clear resistance at 11125, a level it either probed of looked on five consecutive sessions earlier this month without ever being able to break through it. If it does manage to gain a foothold and close above it, the 50-day moving average at 11442 and 2020 low of 11570 would be the logical initial upside targets.

For those looking to establish longs on a clear break and hold above 11125, a stop-loss could be placed below for protection. For those without the patience, support is located too far below for protection unless you have a substantially higher upside target. As such, if you go long prior to any potential break, make sure your stop level is one that has favorable potential returns for the risk you’re taking.

-- Written by David Scutt

Follow David on Twitter @scutty

 

How to trade with City Index

You can trade with City Index by following these four easy steps:

  1. Open an account, or log in if you’re already a customer 

    Open an account in the UK
    Open an account in Australia
    Open an account in Singapore

  2. Search for the market you want to trade in our award-winning platform 
  3. Choose your position and size, and your stop and limit levels 
  4. Place the trade

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024