CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Bank Watch Stress Tests spotlight on Barclays

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

Testing times are back for execs at the UK’s biggest banks: annual results of the Bank of England’s stress tests will be released on Tuesday. The Bank orders lenders to conduct ‘what if’ exercises of varying severity each year.

Whilst an explanation of the test scenarios runs to 26 pages in this explainer on the BoE’s website, their aim is simple: to root out overlooked areas of financial weakness that could make them a risk to themselves, their depositors and society as a whole in the event of an economic, financial or corporate shock.

The tests are of course an important safeguard for the financial system as a whole, and they are certainly taken seriously by bank investors.  RBS failed last year’s stress test. Its stock fell about 5% on the news. The bank then had to raise capital by cutting costs and selling £2bn in assets.

Test anxiety may be a little higher this year. 2017 is the first year that the BoE ran an “additional exploratory scenario”, designed to test how the banking system would cope if recent headwinds to bank profitability were to persist or intensify. Even more unsettling for banks, this set of tests does not focus on capital adequacy. Rather “Its purpose is to explore the impact of banks’ actions on both the real economy and the future resilience of the system to shocks.”

Either way, the chances that a major bank will fail this year’s tests look remote given that their closely watched key capital buffers—Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1)—have strengthened since last year’s tests, or at least, in the case of Barclays, have been steady. The average CET1 of Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and RBS in the current financial year is 13.30% right now, 112 basis points better than in November 2016, according to Thomson Reuters data.

Still, even assuming it passes the tests Barclays may find itself marked out for particular commentary from the BoE since its capital buffer is now the lowest among the Big 4 lenders, according to the chart below. (Note the data includes estimates for the most recent values). Such negative attention and the likely hit to Barclays’ shares would be fitting end to a rough year for the bank. It is already the worst-performing big UK bank share due to deteriorating earnings quality and investor disquiet over strategic direction.

The test results will be published at 0700 GMT on Tuesday, followed by a press conference with BoE Governor Mark Carney.

Figure 1: Tier 1 capital ratio time series for LLoyds Banking Group, Barclays, HSBC and RBS (two years)

Source: Thomson Reuters and City Index


StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024