CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

ASOS shares spike on low cut expectations

Article By: ,  Financial Analyst

Updated 1403 BST

ASOS stock is enjoying one of its infamous spikes on Wednesday, after beating fairly easy expectations.

The online-based purveyor of affordable fashion sashayed past The City’s average EPS forecast of about 14.6p with earnings of 17.6p.

But as has been the case for as long as I can remember, ASOS’s bottom line looks great when you first take it out of the wrapping, but less so on closer examination.

 

News of insurance cashback ‘warehoused’

So for instance, a consensus forecast of H1 2015 half-year pre-tax profit, compiled by Thomson Reuters, showed the average expectation was a lenient £16.3m.

ASOS beat this by coming in at £18m.

But that is still 10% lower than the same period a year ago.

On even closer inspection, it becomes apparent that even this relative outperformance needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.

ASOS revealed elsewhere in its statement that an insurance reimbursement for the warehouse fire last year in fact accounted for £6.3m of its first-half profit before tax.

Therefore, the underlying fall in pre-tax profit was a much more difficult to downplay 41.8% to £11.7m

 

‘Investment in price competitiveness’

Make no mistake, I have warmed a great deal to ASOS CEO Nick Robertson and his long-standing management team, who more than proved their mettle during a horrendously challenging 2014 for the firm.

And much of the delayed profit growth ASOS displays can partly be explained by continued recuperation and laudable investment in distribution, systems and other long-term advantages.

However, such initiatives as the “continued investment in our international price competitiveness gaining traction” Robertson boasts of in today’s statement just bring me back to where my misgivings start.

The impact from this ‘investment in price’ (cuts) in the half year was a 230 basis point gross margin contraction, with the increased investment in distribution capacity also weighing, though how much should be attributed to each factor isn’t made clear.

But whilst Robertson looks past this softness, instead taking “confidence in the outlook for the second half”, the timeframe over which we should expect these sorts of initiatives and ASOS overall to show sustainable profitable growth remains unspecified.

 

Fast fashion, fast shares

In a nutshell, that’s why ASOS is a wild high-beta stock matched on that metric over 5 years by few comparable retailers, save for Ocado.

This high volatility has left the stock 45% lower than its high in February 2014, even after it bounced by more than 125% off a bottom hit in October!

In an alternative world, such instability ought to burst the market’s inflated optimism on ASOS stock, measured by a price/earnings ratio that swerves in the high 80s.

Within a raft of similar high street and superhighway fashion merchants, ASOS leads average PE by 90%.

Instead, we know the real world is in fact the ‘alternative’ universe (for more conservative investors).

And it’s one in which for some ‘growth stocks’, optimism needs little fundamental basis, especially in the face of real wins of the like ASOS reported today—H1 retail sales ascending 17%, stripping out currency effects, and international sales up a solid 10%.

On such days, the gap to the stock’s next visible challenge looks do-able, even if the give-back is typically as easy as ASOS’s returns policy.

 

 

 

However, more than half way into Wednesday’s session, the Slow Stochastic Oscillator trading system attached to a chart of City Index’s ASOS Daily Funded Trade, emitted a signal to exit short positions.

This negated a ‘sell’ signal issued by the system during the half-hourly interval between 1030 and 11 AM.

The system’s moving average lines were well within acceptable bounds and pointing upwards, providing reasonable grounds for further short-term strength in the title.

 

 

 

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024